data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3ff/6b3ffd6f9f524aa958721fc1be7397cc6eea9396" alt=""
Peepee Gooseman ("the Junkyard Swan") forwarded this bizarre chart to me. What it says, basically, is that if you're 'religious' (and that's defined by people reporting, in a relatively small study, that 'religion is important to them', and not much else), you're going to end up poor. Now, this could be seen as "poor people turn to religion in their need", which is sociologically viable, but it could also be seen as "getting into bed with religion somehow goes hand in hand with getting into bed with poverty", and that's what I'd like to discuss. Even if the chart is bunk (and I'm not putting a ton of stock in it), it piqued my thoughts. Maybe I've communicated what's below before, but it bears repeating:
When in Nigeria (the most religious place I HAVE EVER SEEN, if you don't remember my writing about it last summer), I came across a guy who told me very matter-of-fact that the reason Nigeria was such a poor country was because of its religious context. My ears immediately perked up and I asked him (the man's name is Jarlot) what he meant. "It's right there in the Bible," he said.
"Psalm 133 clearly states that when the brothers dwell together in unity, God likes and sends a blessing. And we know that one of the goals of religion is division on massive scales. So where there is religion, division comes. Where there is division, there is no unity. God's blessing is revoked: poverty." He said it like it was single-digit addition.
Also, according to this chart, America clearly has a religious hangover from the last "great awakening".